Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
distributions_of_shocks_in_simulations [2020/06/18 15:34]
tr
distributions_of_shocks_in_simulations [2020/06/19 10:38] (current)
tr
Line 11: Line 11:
 **__Info :__** **__Info :__**
  
-Distributions are no longer normalised, the numbers on the y axis are therefore numbers of scans. ​+Distributions are no longer normalised, the numbers on the y axis are therefore numbers of scans. I kept only the best identifications we have (purest wave decompositions). It just makes distributions cleaner and analysis simpler
  
 {{:​abc_v_scan.png?​540 |}} {{:​abc_v_scan.png?​540 |}}
Line 63: Line 63:
 **Thibaud**:​ **Thibaud**:​
 I am actually doing it, but it's a lot of data and my internet connection is not very fast here... I'll tell you if is bimodal too.  I am actually doing it, but it's a lot of data and my internet connection is not very fast here... I'll tell you if is bimodal too. 
 +
 +[Update :]
 +
 +{{:​abc_b_scan.png?​540 |}}
 +
 +{{:​ot_b_scan.png?​540 |}}
  
 **Andrew**: **Andrew**:
Line 168: Line 174:
  
 So as usual higher shock velocities lead to higher shear velocities. But for a fixed shock velocity lower magnetic field strength gives higher shear velocity. So as usual higher shock velocities lead to higher shear velocities. But for a fixed shock velocity lower magnetic field strength gives higher shear velocity.
 +
 +**__Magnetic field increments__**
 +
 +{{:​abc_b_perp.png?​540 |}}
 +
 +{{:​ot_b_perp.png?​540 |}}
 +
 +{{:​abc_b_perp1.png?​540 |}}
 +
 +{{:​ot_b_perp1.png?​540 |}}
 +
 +{{:​abc_bperp_norm.png?​540 |}}
 +
 +{{:​ot_bperp_norm.png?​540 |}}
  • distributions_of_shocks_in_simulations.1592487280.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2020/06/18 15:34
  • by tr